Enterprise Account Executive Assessment

See how candidates prospect complex accounts, run multi-threaded deals, and close six-figure contracts before you interview them.

20 to 30 minutes for candidates • Ranked shortlist • Interview ready insights

Shortlisted for Assessment Provider of the Year, recognising innovation in hiring assessment

The Problem With Hiring Enterprise Account Execs

Hiring Enterprise Account Executive usually starts with CV screening and short phone interviews. These steps are time-consuming, inconsistent, and weak predictors of real performance.

CVs rarely show how candidates:

  • Prospect into large, complex organisations

  • Build and advance multi-stakeholder deal cycles

  • Qualify enterprise opportunities against strict deal criteria

  • Manage pricing, procurement, and legal constraints

Phone interviews help, but they still reward confidence over capability. This is where many poor hires slip through.

Why hiring breaks down
CV
Phone
Neuroworx
Shows how candidates handle frustrated customers
~
Tests communication under pressure
~
Reveals judgement in real scenarios
~
Distinguishes confidence from capability
Consistent across all candidates
~
~
Predictive of on-the-job performance
~
Live evidence flow
Signals build as candidates respond
Candidate completes
Customer scenarios
Realistic judgement calls and written replies
Neuroworx analyses
Signals extracted
Consistent scoring across every candidate
Hiring managers receive
Shortlist and interview prompts
Strengths, risks, and follow ups per candidate
Ranked shortlist
Risk flags
Interview questions

How Neuroworx adds evidence before interviews

Neuroworx adds a short, role-specific assessment before interviews, so hiring decisions are based on observed behaviour, not assumptions.

Candidates complete realistic scenarios and short written responses that reflect the day-to-day demands of an Enterprise Account Executive role.

This allows you to see how candidates:

  • Prospect into realistic enterprise account scenarios

  • Progress multi-threaded opportunities with conflicting stakeholders

  • Qualify deals using enterprise-level decision frameworks

  • Navigate pricing pressure, procurement delays, and legal objections

Instead of relying on CVs and early phone screens alone, interviews are informed by consistent, comparable evidence for every candidate.

How the Assessment Works

A simple, role specific flow from invite to shortlist.

1
Invite candidates
Send a role specific assessment link to shortlisted applicants.
Branded platform Sharable links Bulk invites Email templates ATS friendly Auto reminders
Invite in minutes and keep the experience consistent for every candidate.
2
Candidates complete
Realistic scenarios and short written responses that reflect the role.
Scenario judgement Written response Timed sections Randomised items Tab switching flags Anti cheating
Built in controls reduce gaming and highlight unusual test behaviour.
3
Review and shortlist
Compare candidates using consistent evidence before interviews.
Ranked shortlist Risk flags Confidence Strengths Development areas Interview prompts
Use the report to decide who to interview and what to probe.

See the Assessment in Action

Explore the scenarios candidates complete and how responses are captured.

What the Assessment Looks Like for Candidates

A short, role-specific experience designed to surface judgement, tone, and real-world decision-making.

Assessment Preview

Enterprise Account Executive

Interactive preview: select answers to see how the report signals are formed. Preview is untimed and does not score.

Role: Recruitment Consultant Format: SJT + short response Hiring manager preview
Preview progress
0/2 answered ~10–12 min (full)
Response profile (sample)
EarlierLater
Scenario judgement
Signals: judgement • client communication
What would you do first?
Preview selections update the live signals panel on the right.
Short response
Signals: tone • clarity • execution
Select a response style (preview)
Select a response style above to preview how signals change.
In the live assessment, candidates type a response. The report flags clarity, judgement, and stakeholder management.
Live preview
How this becomes the report
Risk: —
Overall suitability
/100
Select answers to populate Confidence: —
Signals
Judgement
Client communication
Execution
Highlights
  • Choose options on the left to see example insights.
Risk matrix (sample)
Lower riskHigher impact
This is illustrative preview logic only. In production, scoring is derived from your validated model.

What you get and who this is for

Decision ready output for hiring with minimal work from your team.

What you get
A ranked shortlist with decision-ready evidence
  • Ranked shortlist of candidates by overall suitability
  • Strengths and risk flags in plain English (client, candidate, and judgement signals)
  • Interview follow ups tailored to each candidate
  • Skill breakdown across judgement, client communication, prioritisation, and execution
Example output
1     Strong match 84
2     Good option 81
Who this is for
Ideal when early screening is noisy
  • You hire Enterprise Account Executives (agency or in-house)
  • You spend too much time on CV review and phone screening
  • You want consistent shortlisting across hiring managers
  • You need evidence beyond confidence and sales talk
Typical impact
Reduce early stage interview time by 40 to 60 percent
More consistent shortlists across teams and offices
Fewer low quality interviews reaching later stages
Clearer interview focus using strengths, risks, and follow ups

What the Candidate Report Looks Like

A clear, decision-ready summary showing strengths, risks, and interview follow-ups for each candidate.

Sample Candidate Report

Enterprise Account Executives

Example output hiring managers receive after a candidate completes the assessment.

Overall suitability
Strong match
Confidence: High
Top 22%
Suitability78/100
Clear evidence of strong candidate judgement and confident client communication.
Decision-ready highlights
Key strengths
  • Builds rapport quickly with both candidates and clients
  • Balances speed with quality when shortlisting
  • Communicates clearly under competing priorities
Potential risk areas
  • May over-index on candidate enthusiasm vs evidence
  • Could challenge unrealistic client expectations earlier
Skill breakdown
Candidate vs typical benchmark
Judgement
76%
Client communication
84%
Prioritisation
79%
Execution
71%
Suggested interview follow-ups
  • Ask how they balance speed vs quality when a client needs shortlists urgently.
  • Explore how they challenge a hiring manager when requirements are unrealistic.
  • Probe how they assess candidate motivation versus capability.
Note: this is a sample report preview. Full reports include role-specific weighting and benchmarking.

Ready to see how we can help?

Book a 15 minute demo to see how hiring managers use this in real roles.

15 minutes. No commitment. See real examples.